@Dr-Science.. that's exactly why i said "zombies" not zombies... maybe they could be better referred to as Infected.. but usually people call them zombies.the imdb description is irrelevant. you can edit that yourself. the story can't possibly be a continuation because the virus doesn't provide a method for feeding as was the whole reason the how it came to an end in 28 days later and the name of the film. it makes it impossible to be a continuation. there is nothing similar about 28 years later and 28 days/weeks later other than the number "28" and the appearance of the original character as an infected. But again considering the rage virus provides no method to allow them to feed. obviously it's impossible that they are still alive and infected 28 years later.
this is film not part of the 28 days/weeks later series. this is film no. 2 in the 28 years later series. people don't seem to understand this. it's got nothing to do with 28 days/weeks later. the "zombies" don't behave the same at all. the plot/premise is not a continuation of either and if it was 28 weeks later wouldn't make sense at all. 28 days later is called that because that's how long the "zombies" survive because they have no mechanism to feed.
i think i'm done with masculinised behaviour pasted onto female characters. found it completely unbelievable. The writing doesn’t reinterpret these traits through a female lens It just copies the male template wholesale. ripley in alien, sarah connor in terminator didn’t do this. It’s not that women can’t be warriors, leaders, or fighters It’s that the writing often refuses to explore female-coded strength
admin you have a choice, delete this nonsense now, or be prepared for setting a precedent where any channel of nonesense on youtube is considered a tv series and have this category flooded with crap that drowns out genuine tv series.
first three episodes of season 2 are equally as boring as episodes 1-6 of season 1. i don't think this show deserves its imdb rating. it's too slow, too much focus on crap that isn't even relevant. there is no urge to watch another episode, it's not gripping at all.
megusta downloads work fine and i generally prefer them due to the lower size files with zero noticeable quality difference. series is pretty boring. first season has about 6 episodes of irrelevant drama and then 2 episodes of anything real happening and that wasn't exactly amazing either.
A great many viewers contend that Star Trek: Starfleet Academy collapses under a dissonant fusion of YA‑inflected melodrama, performative irreverence, and lore‑indifferent writing—manifesting in slouching captains, adolescent cadet histrionics, tonal juvenility, shallow moral architecture, aesthetic incoherence, and a pervasive abandonment of the franchise’s aspirational, disciplined, and philosophically rigorous identity—leaving the series feeling less like an heir to Trek’s intellectual lineage and more like a generic contemporary teen serial draped in borrowed iconography.
Why adaptations get this wrong - Most modern fantasy defaults to: English accents, English landscapes, English cultural assumptions. Because that’s the “default” fantasy aesthetic inherited from Tolkien and Hollywood. But it erases the fact that Arthurian myth is fundamentally a Welsh/Brythonic tradition, later absorbed and re‑written by Norman and English authors. “Britain” was a geographic term, not a political one. In the post‑Roman period (roughly 400–600 CE) There was no England, There was no unified Britain, There were multiple Brythonic kingdoms. The Welsh language is the closest living descendant of the language Merlin would have spoken. So portraying Merlin as if he’s from some early version of England is historically off‑base.