i think i'm done with masculinised behaviour pasted onto female characters. found it completely unbelievable. The writing doesn’t reinterpret these traits through a female lens It just copies the male template wholesale. ripley in alien, sarah connor in terminator didn’t do this. It’s not that women can’t be warriors, leaders, or fighters It’s that the writing often refuses to explore female-coded strength
admin you have a choice, delete this nonsense now, or be prepared for setting a precedent where any channel of nonesense on youtube is considered a tv series and have this category flooded with crap that drowns out genuine tv series.
first three episodes of season 2 are equally as boring as episodes 1-6 of season 1. i don't think this show deserves its imdb rating. it's too slow, too much focus on crap that isn't even relevant. there is no urge to watch another episode, it's not gripping at all.
megusta downloads work fine and i generally prefer them due to the lower size files with zero noticeable quality difference. series is pretty boring. first season has about 6 episodes of irrelevant drama and then 2 episodes of anything real happening and that wasn't exactly amazing either.
A great many viewers contend that Star Trek: Starfleet Academy collapses under a dissonant fusion of YA‑inflected melodrama, performative irreverence, and lore‑indifferent writing—manifesting in slouching captains, adolescent cadet histrionics, tonal juvenility, shallow moral architecture, aesthetic incoherence, and a pervasive abandonment of the franchise’s aspirational, disciplined, and philosophically rigorous identity—leaving the series feeling less like an heir to Trek’s intellectual lineage and more like a generic contemporary teen serial draped in borrowed iconography.
Why adaptations get this wrong - Most modern fantasy defaults to: English accents, English landscapes, English cultural assumptions. Because that’s the “default” fantasy aesthetic inherited from Tolkien and Hollywood. But it erases the fact that Arthurian myth is fundamentally a Welsh/Brythonic tradition, later absorbed and re‑written by Norman and English authors. “Britain” was a geographic term, not a political one. In the post‑Roman period (roughly 400–600 CE) There was no England, There was no unified Britain, There were multiple Brythonic kingdoms. The Welsh language is the closest living descendant of the language Merlin would have spoken. So portraying Merlin as if he’s from some early version of England is historically off‑base.
Imagine if they did a short about "a man chooses to accept his natural appearance despite social pressures around beauty and grooming standards" - you'd think the director was a bit daft. yet here we are.
while mildly interesting, i didn't find it engaging or ground breaking. it wasn't awful, it just wasn't amazing. i was surprised to realise season 2 had ended, i was expecting another episode.
I went to the cinema last night and all I can say is that it was a waste of time, without a captivating or even interesting script, without a story. Awkward in places, some scenes hard to watch but that doesn't make it a horror movie. A waste of time and money, there were people who left the theater.
when websites like this start to comply with the demands of the industry, it makes me concerned. concerned that this site is not what it appears to be.